Connect with us

articles

Pakistan’s Zero Sum Game – Some Historical Perspectives-1

Published

on

Author: Dr. Subroto Gangopadhay

Press Release:  http://indiafacts.org/pakistans-zero-sum-game-historical-perspectives-1/

Pakistan and India fought the first Kashmir war between October 1947 and December 1948. At the time of independence, the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was independently ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh, of the Dogra dynasty. The ruler had the option of remaining independent, joining India or Pakistan. Jammu and Kashmir, demographically had a predominantly a Muslim population, mostly converted during the five centuries of Muslim rule over the region that preceded the hundred years Hindu Dogra rule at the time of independence. Hari Singh was undecided about the path he wanted to choose for his kingdom. The Muslim rebellion soon broke out in Jammu and was the pretext of the Tribal Muslims (Pashtuns from NWFP mostly) and the Pakistani Army to cross over to capture the state. They had begun to run over Hari Singh’s forces. The King appealed to India to respond with military help, and in return signed the formal instrument of accession with India, as required by India, on 26th October, 1947. Indian forces thereafter entered and the protracted battle continued over a year before the formal ceasefire on Jan 1, 1949. At that time, Pakistan had gained significant territory, though India had the majority. At the beginning of the 1947 invasion, the Pakistani forces had advanced without problems before the first resistance at Uri. Pakistan has not halted its campaign since, nor has the theatre of war changed.

Pakistani identification with Caliphate

Pakistan launched Operation Gibraltar in the late summer of 1965. Pakistani Army had a regiment called Azad Kashmir Regimental Force that today is called Azad Kashmir Regiment. The operation was named after Umayyad conquest of Spain, launched from the Port Of Gibraltar in 711. The symbolism has little to do with India or Pakistan’s own history, but refers to the Pakistani State’s identification with the history of the expansion of the Caliphate. In operation Gibraltar, about 30,000 Pakistani troops infiltrated Kashmir as guerilla fighters, confident that their visions of an Islamic Caliphate will resonate with the majority Muslim population of Kashmir and that an open rebellion would lead to Kashmir’s secession. The operation was a spectacular failure, as the Kashmiris had a greater respect and identification with their own history than that of the Arabian Caliphate. This failed operation launched the Indo-Pakistan war of 1965, with a ceasefire, brokered at the UN by USA and USSR.  By the time the ceasefire was declared, India had the upper hand in the three weeks, ferocious conflict. The Tashkent declaration of 1966 followed. India lost Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkent, a national tragedy that has escaped the period historians. The 1965 conflict was the result of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s conviction that after India’s capitulation to the Chinese forces in 1962, Pakistan could inflict a decisive defeat on India. He had successfully persuaded President, Marshall Ayub Khan to his point of view. Ayub Khan referred to the infiltrators as Bhutto’s Mujahids.

Operation Searchlight – Genocide and Rape of Bengalis

Pakistan’s disastrous cultural blindness and rejection of East Pakistan’s due political, executive and economic rights, led to disaffection and desire for cessation. In the 1970 general elections in Pakistan, despite winning 167 of 169 seats in E Pakistan, and hence an absolute Majority in Pakistani Parliament of 313 elected members, ZA Bhutto (People’s Party) and President, Gen Yahya Khan refused Sheikh Mujibur Rehman, his due right of becoming Pakistan’s Prime Minister. Yahya, a personal friend of Nixon, responded by unleashing a pogrom on the rightfully dissenting East Pakistanis. The Punjabi (and West Pakistan) dominated Military were set upon their own countrymen in E Pakistan. Operation Searchlight launched the infamous genocide of Bengalis (selectively targeting Hindus), in which a reported two to three million were slaughtered. Countless women were raped and ten million refugees entered West Bengal, causing enormous hardship to the state and India’s economy. The world remained silent in the face of this humanitarian disaster.

American complicity in Indo-Pak war of 1971

The East Pakistanis in the Pakistan army defected and formed part of the Mukti Bahini that India supported. Indira Gandhi, India’s Prime minister, was rebuffed by the American Administration of Nixon and Kissinger, both of whom personally despised her. When Indira Gandhi visited Washington in November 1971, Nixon made her wait 45 minutes before granting audience, and went on to extend his support to the largest genocide of human beings, since the Jews suffered at the hands of the Nazis. Nixon and Kissinger supported Pakistan, a member of the American led military pact CENTO and SEATO. In July 1971, Henry Kissinger had been to Beijing, where Zhou- En Lai went on record to say that they supported Pakistan and would not sit by idly, if India continued on its course of confrontation. It is also a matter of record that Mr. Kissinger confirmed American Support of Pakistan to the Chinese during this visit. On August 9, 1971, India signed the peace, cooperation and friendship treaty, with the Soviet Union, ending its formal policy of non- alignment.

Pakistan’s policy of naming military operations and missiles after Islamic invaders

For the record, India’s formal entry into the war in 1971 was in response to Pakistan launching Operation Chengiz Khan with attacks on 11 Indian airbases on December 3, 1971. Once again the symbolism of operation Chengiz Khan is unmistakable. Pakistanis indeed have forgotten that it is their forefathers, who suffered slaughter at the hands of the Mongol Invader. Instead, he was their hero, to be emulated, by invading India. This strange thought process also permeates their naming of missile systems after Ghazni, Gauri and so on.  Pakistan, to this day psychologically considers itself as the remnant lineage of the ‘glorious invading Islamic armies of antiquity’ that killed their forefathers as well.

As the war unfolded in 1971, the US advanced the 7th Fleet with the largest aircraft carrier in the world- USS Enterprise, with USS King, USS Tripoli, USS Decatur and USS Tartar Sam to threaten the Bay of Bengal, while the British Royal Navy sent its fleet led by EAGLE to threaten India’s West Coast. India was saved due to Soviet Intervention, with their nuclear-armed ships and submarines encircling the American Navy. This also warned off the Chinese, who had been requested by the Nixon administration to move their troops along India’s Northern borders.  Britain’s role was nefarious and the UN’s role non-existent.

But, Israel did send arms to India, despite India’s support to Arabs and failure to grant Israel diplomatic recognition until 1992.

Pakistan’s defeat and birth of radical jihadi warriors as state instruments

India’s decisive victory in 1971 and vivisection of Pakistan, was probably the most humiliating event in Pakistan’s history. Pakistani ruling elites seem to have harbored ambitions of creating an Islamic Caliphate with imposition of the Arab language, Arab Culture and Salafist ideology on their own people and advance the same beyond their borders. Imposition of a single foreign identity on Kashmiris, Baluchi’s, Sindhis and Pashtuns, like the Bengalis, is a delusional and destructive idea no different than ISIL’s goal of homogeneity. Imprisonment of Waseem Akhtar, the elected MQM Mayor of Karachi-the largest city and hub of commerce and culture- reflects the disconnect between the people, their choices and their state.

The 1971 war not only failed to bring circumspection, it actually led to greater reinforcement of failed ideas. It spurred the state into creating, nurturing, training, funding and using radical Islamic fundamentalist forces as an active arm of state policy. This was to be formally supported and organized with the help of the United States, determined to displace a Socialist, Soviet leaning regime from Afghanistan, as the seventies transitioned into the eighties. Gen Zia- Ul- Haq, who removed ZA Bhutto, with alleged American Support in 1977, remained the President from 1978 to 1988, where he became a firm ally in eliminating Soviets. This is the period, when the Pakistani ISI and the US oversaw the creation of an international Jihadi force of Taliban and Mujahedeen Warriors, as tools of the American foreign Policy. This was a symbiosis between the world’s most powerful democracy and the world’s most violent fundamentalist force. America and Pakistan were the parents of Taliban and of the development and promotion of Opium and Heroin trade as instruments of foreign policy (which the Taliban had actually opposed).  Pakistan became a pawn to American goals of planning the demise of the Soviets. In a quid pro quo, the US allowed promotion of the secession of Kashmir through violent jihadi outfits, which it co-created with the ISI.

Operation Tupac

Once the Soviets withdrew (1988-89) and the USSR officially broke up (December 1991), it became easy to redirect the Jihadis to the Kashmir theater under the new Operation Tupac, which had commenced officially in 1988, under the orders of Zia Ul Haq. Operation Tupac remains in existence to this day with its declared objectives of 1) Disintegrating India 2) Utilizing Spy networks for Sabotage and 3) Using the loose borders with Nepal and Bangladesh to set up bases and conduct operations. Operation Tupac has had great success in comparison to the failed Operation Gibraltar. It is also worth noting that the escalating Khalistan Movement that reached a peak in India in the 80’s had a Pakistani sponsorship with at least tacit US support. The Government of India had protested US involvement and the backing of Khalistan, in a formal protest, duly denied by George Bush Senior, US Vice president in 1984, during his India visit.

Conclusions:  

* Pakistan’s policy on Kashmir is a publicly declared state policy, e.g. Operation Tupac.  Covert and overt means have been used for more than 50 years and shall continue.

* Trying to prove Pakistan’s complicity in every attack is both redundant and self-defeating given the declared Pakistani policy seeking India’s disintegration.

*The incessant efforts to present evidence to the world makes India looks weak to the very powers that were complicit in letting this happen. It also offers a plausible deniability to Pakistan, which has never hidden its policy goals from the world. India’s interest in stirring debate is a poor cover for unwillingness to have a clear policy of response.

*The media, politicians and interlocutors of India have chosen to mislead their own country into a make-believe world of political solutions, peace and bonhomie through shared culture. They have deliberately obliterated the obvious history between India and Pakistan, since partition.

*To the amusement of the Pakistani Establishment, India stills coddles a culture, which the ruling Military- Jihadi elite in Pakistan, has proscribed for its own country. Officially, Pakistan has chosen to enforce an Arabic monoculture of language (Urdu), dress and theocratic dogma on its own citizens .The Baluchistan freedom struggle, the disaffection of Sindhis and Pashtuns are a testimony to Pakistan’s vision for itself. The creation of Bangladesh is testimony to the same.

* Why India’s left, secular intelligentsia, cultural vanguards, and political parties fail to digest a fairly compulsive set of simple historical facts remains unknown.

Photo credit: Nimblefoundation.org

Disclaimer: The facts and opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. IndiaFacts does not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article.

Continue Reading

articles

CONSTRUCTING GENDER IDENTITIES IN DEATH : RETHINKING MORTUARY ARCHAEOLOGY THROUGH THE EVIDENCE OF SINAULI

Published

on

The archaeological site at Sinauli in Uttar Pradesh has provided significant insight into ancient burial practices, gender identities, and social hierarchy in South Asia. The evidence uncovered at Sinauli challenges long-held assumptions and offers fresh perspectives on mortality, gender roles, and elite status in ancient Indian society.

Location and Historical Context

Sinauli is situated in the Baghpat district of western Uttar Pradesh, lying within the fertile Upper Ganga-Yamuna Doab region. It is associated with the Ochre Coloured Pottery (OCP) culture, which dates back to the early second millennium BCE. This site gained attention due to its unique burial practices, especially those involving women and the material assemblages found with their graves.

Overview of Excavations

The Sinauli excavations were initiated in 2005 under archaeologist D.V. Sharma, and further work was conducted in 2018 by Dr. Sanjay Manjul. In 2005, archaeologists uncovered 116 burials, typically oriented north-south, along with ochre-colored pottery. The 2018 excavations revealed even greater complexity, including wooden coffins adorned with copper sheets, rectangular boxes, antenna swords, helmets, shields, pots, and controversial wheeled vehicles—leading to a debate over whether these were chariots or carts.

Types of Burials

Sinauli yielded four primary burial types:
– Symbolic burials without skeletons.
– Primary burials with full skeletons.
– Secondary or fragmented burials.
– Multiple burials containing fragmented remains.

Gender Distinctions in Burial Practices

A significant contribution of Sinauli is its challenge to conventional views on gender and mortuary archaeology. Certain burials, notably those identified by Asko Parpola, show that elite women were sometimes interred in richly decorated coffins with martial symbols such as swords, shields, and wheeled vehicles. Coffins for women featured steatite inlay and were often covered, in contrast to men’s coffins, which generally had copper sheathing and were left uncovered. Such differentiation suggests elaborate symbolism surrounding gender and possibly ritual seclusion or heightened sacredness for women in death.

One highly debated aspect is the absence of feet in Burial-1, which might suggest less earthly mobility or represent a transformation from earthly to transcendent status.

Rethinking Weaponry and Gender

The presence of weapons, such as copper antenna swords and shields, in women’s graves at Sinauli has prompted scholars to reconsider rigid notions of gender roles. These martial objects could signal the dead’s authority—either as warriors or ritual leaders—thus broadening our understanding of gender within ancient funerary contexts. Interestingly, such elaborate martial symbolism is less prevalent in the male burials at Sinauli.

Symbolism of Coffins and Elite Status

Coffins at Sinauli, rare in South Asian archaeology, were more than mere containers; they symbolically transformed the deceased into sacred beings. Their intricate decoration reflects considerable labor, resources, and craftsmanship, indicating elite status and the possibility of gendered authority within the social hierarchy.

Conclusions and Implications

The burial evidence from Sinauli emphasizes material distinctions that reveal social stratification, hierarchy, and constructed gender roles. While the idea of women warriors remains debated, the presence of martial symbols with elite women points towards complex rituals and conceptions of social power in death. Sinauli thus stands out as a crucial site for rethinking gender identities, social class, and the symbolic aspects of funerary practices in ancient India.

Continue Reading

articles

Rediscovering Sutanuti: IHAR WB CHAPTER’S Second Heritage Walk

Published

on

On Sunday, October 26, 2025, the organization Indian History Awareness and Research (IHAR) embarked on its inaugural heritage walk, titled “Rediscovering Sutanuti.”
Dedicated to the study, research, preservation, and public awareness of Indian history, IHAR has long aimed to connect people with the layers of India’s historical and cultural legacy. This heritage walk marked a significant step in that direction.

Why Sutanuti?

The choice of Sutanuti as the focus of IHAR’s first heritage walk was profoundly symbolic.
It was here, on August 24, 1690, that Job Charnock, an officer of the East India Company, is believed to have landed—a moment that would reshape the destiny of Bengal and, indeed, the entire Indian subcontinent.
Although the Company had visited Sutanuti earlier, it was this arrival that initiated a chain of events culminating in nearly two centuries of colonial rule, lasting until August 14, 1947.

On November 10, 1698, the East India Company entered into an agreement with the Sabarna Roy Chowdhury family, acquiring the zamindari (lease rights) of three villages—Kalikata, Govindpur, and Sutanuti—for an annual rent of ₹1300.
This agreement laid the foundation for the rise of Calcutta, though Charnock himself never witnessed it, having passed away in 1693.

Over 335 years later, the Sutanuti of 1690 and that of 2025 appear worlds apart.
Historians still debate the precise locations of Sutanuti Ghat, where Charnock’s ship is believed to have anchored, and Sutanuti Haat, the bustling market once held twice a week for the sale of cotton yarns and threads.
It was this very market that enriched the Seths and Basaks, the early inhabitants of Calcutta, through the textile trade.

Though no physical trace of that port or market survives today, scholars generally agree that Sobhabazar corresponds to the original Sutanuti region.
Accordingly, IHAR chose this locality for its first heritage walk—a symbolic return to the city’s historical roots.

The legacy of Sutanuti lives on in names like Haatkhola (“the open market”), a term derived from the old marketplace and still preserved in local designations such as Haatkhola Post Office.
Similarly, through the efforts of Sutanuti Parishad, the Sobhabazar Metro Station was officially renamed “Sobhabazar Sutanuti.”
Even in the absence of the old market, these surviving names echo the deep emotional and cultural resonance Sutanuti continues to hold for the people of Calcutta and Bengal.

Highlights of the Walk

The heritage walk took participants on a journey through Sutanuti’s remaining landmarks and forgotten corners, each revealing a fragment of Calcutta’s layered past.

B. K. Pal’s House

The first stop was the residence of B. K. Pal, the pioneering Bengali manufacturer and seller of medicines in the 19th century.
His most celebrated creation, Edward Tonic (1887), became a household remedy for fevers and stomach ailments—common and often fatal in colonial Calcutta—earning him a lasting place in Bengal’s medical history.

Shwet Kali Temple

Participants then visited the Shwet Kali Temple on Sobhabazar Street, nearly 300 years old and among the three oldest white Kali temples in Bengal.
Originally a shrine for dacoits, it later became a site of domestic worship. The deity here is distinctive—white in color, two-armed, tongue inside the mouth, and standing over Virupaksha and Kalbhairav, without the usual garland of severed heads.

Raja Janakinath Ray’s Mansion

The walk next stopped at the grand mansion of Raja Janakinath Ray of the Bhagyakul Ray family, prosperous traders from Dhaka and Calcutta.
Built in the 19th century, a part of this palatial building now serves as the Jorabagan Traffic Guard office, while descendants of the Ray family still occupy another section.

Chitpur Road (Rabindra Sarani)

Participants then walked along Chitpur Road, now Rabindra Sarani, regarded as Calcutta’s oldest road, dating back nearly 500 years.
Originally extending from Chitpur to Kalighat and later to Halisahar, the path once cut through dense forests inhabited by wild animals and robbers—an incredible contrast to today’s bustling thoroughfare.

Rameshwar Shiva Temple

Next came the Rameshwar Shiva Temple, built around 1700 by Nandaram Sen, the first native tax collector under the British official Mr. Sheldon.
Standing 80 feet tall, the temple mirrors the Aatchala style of the Kalighat Kali Temple and houses a six-foot-high Shivalinga.

Kumartuli and the Artisans

The walk then entered Kumartuli, where artisans were crafting Jagaddhatri idols.
Participants met Amit Ranjan Karmakar, a rare collector and restorer of vintage radios, tape recorders, and gramophones—all maintained in working order.

Radhagobinda and Baneshwar Shiva Temples

The Radhagobinda Temple and the Aatchala Baneshwar Shiva Temple, built by Bonomali Sarkar, another British-era official, were the next stops.
While the Radhagobinda Temple remains in fair condition, the Baneshwar Shiva Temple lies in neglect, its once-fine terracotta work fading amid weeds.

Kaviraj Gangaprasad Sen’s House

The group then visited the home of Kaviraj Gangaprasad Sen, the eminent 19th-century Ayurvedic physician who migrated from Bikrampur (Dhaka) in 1840.
Revered for his skill, he once treated Sri Ramakrishna Paramahansa and famously predicted that the saint’s illness was incurable—a prophecy now part of Bengal’s spiritual lore.

Dhakeshwari Temple

The Dhakeshwari Temple in Kumartuli houses a 800–1000-year-old ashtadhatu idol, originally enshrined in Dhaka by King Ballal Sen.
After Partition, the idol was smuggled to Calcutta in 1948 and relocated to its present temple in 1950, where it continues to be worshipped.

Madanmohan Temple

The majestic Madanmohan Temple, established in 1761 by Gokul Chandra Mitra, came next.
Once spread across 56 bighas, the temple houses a black stone deity associated with a legend involving King Chaitanya Singh of Mallabhum.
Its Raas and Annakut festivals are still celebrated annually.

Siddheshwari Mata Temple and the Black Pagoda

The final stop was the Siddheshwari Mata Temple in Baghbazar, believed to be over 500 years old.
Founded by a monk named Kalibor, it later came under the worship of the Chakraborty family and their descendants.
The goddess, affectionately known as “The Ginni Maa of Baghbazar,” was revered even by Girish Ghosh and Sri Ramakrishna, the latter once offering tender coconuts for the recovery of Keshab Chandra Sen.

Across the street stands the Black Pagoda, constructed between 1725 and 1730 by Govinda Ram Mitra, the second native revenue collector after Nandaram Sen.
Standing originally over 165 feet tall, it once surpassed even the Ochterlony Monument (Sahid Minar) in height before being partially destroyed in the cyclone of 1737.
Its surviving fragments still whisper tales of Sutanuti’s lost grandeur.

A Journey Through Memory

Thus concluded IHAR’s first heritage walk—a journey through the forgotten heart of Sutanuti, where every lane, temple, and crumbling mansion still bears the faint echo of Calcutta’s beginnings.
Though time has erased much of the physical landscape, the spirit of Sutanuti endures—in its names, in its memories, and in the hearts of those determined to rediscover it.

Continue Reading

articles

Preserving Bengal’s Intellectual Legacy: IHAR West Bengal Chapter Undertakes Detailed Survey of Uttarpara Joykrishna Mukherjee Public Library

Published

on

The site visit report on the Uttarpara Joykrishna Mukherjee Public Library is a comprehensive survey conducted by the Indian History Awareness Research (IHAR) team, highlighting the library’s unparalleled status as a treasure trove of rare manuscripts, books, and archival materials crucial for understanding Bengal and India’s cultural and intellectual heritage. This survey was prompted by concerns raised by the descendants of Shri Joykrishna Mukherjee regarding the fragile state of invaluable collections within this historic institution. As an independent organization committed to heritage conservation, IHAR assessed the library to recommend steps for its safekeeping, digitization, and modernization, thereby continuing the library’s legacy as a pillar of learning and knowledge since its inception in 1859.

The project was overseen by Project Director Shri Surya Sarathi Roy, Director of India Operations at IHAR. The IHAR team comprised notable members including Shri Bhujang Bobde (Director, Karnataka Epigraphic Conservationist Archives), Ms. Manideepa Basu (Executive Member, Indian Museum), Ms. Mouli Roy (Executive Member, National Library), and Shri Sumit Ganguly (Co-Convenor Academic, IHAR), among others. Their collective expertise in history, museology, conservation, and law was pivotal in conducting a detailed evaluation of the library’s current condition and proposing actionable measures for its preservation.

Continue Reading

Trending

Designed by ihar © 2025