Connect with us

articles

Understanding Modi’s Sanskrit Epithets-I

Published

on

Author: Dr. Jayakumar Srinivasan

Press Release:  indiafacts.org/understanding-modis-sanskrit-epithets-i/

Have you noticed that Modi’s speeches are sprinkled with many phrases that are not in Hindi, like “Ahimsa Paramo DharmaH”?  Most of these are in “Samskritam”, or “Sanskrit” in Anglicized form.  What do these quotes mean?

During my years working in the USA, I could not but notice the pride children had in their country, and the amount of knowledge they had about their country’s past.  Later, I had the opportunity to study the curriculum taught in the schools.  The connection became very apparent.

Every child was taught about the sacrifices made by its “founding fathers” beginning with Christopher Columbus’ voyages and Discovery of the New World.  Likewise the sacrifices and leadership of the presidents such as Thomas Jefferson’s writing of the Declaration of Independence, George Washington as the Commander of the Armed forces during the Revolutionary War and as the first President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln’s leadership in the abolishment of slavery are the primary lessons in schools. The enshrinement of Liberty as a fundamental value of America and the founding of one of the greatest nations in the world is etched in the minds of children.

dollar

The US Currency Bill

The founders were proud Christians and the country was made possible by the blessings of (Christian) God.  USA is a secular country built on Christian Principles[1].  Hence the motto “In God we Trust” in every Dollar currency note, referring to their devotion to their Christian God.

The curriculum in High Schools includes a section on world religions with a healthy dose of Christianity.  The end result – every child grows up a patriotic citizen with a healthy sense of self-identity and rootedness.

It was the seventies, when I schooled in India.  By the time I was ready to go to college, I had come to learn that the British taught us how to speak, the Greek taught us reason and philosophy, and from Arabia and Islam came mathematics and architecture.

I was not taught that the country had a hoary past going back several thousand years, I had not heard the word Upanishad and its metaphysics that scientists haven’t been able to refute.  Not much was said about the great sacrifices made by icons like Subhash Chandra Bose and Veer Savarkar.  There was little or no mention of Kittur Chinnamma, Veerapandiya Kattabomman and Subrahmanya Bharati.  Countless monuments such as the famous UN Heritage site Brihadeeshwara temple in Thanjavur remain unexplored or even unknown.  I had no idea that our Urukku steel became popular in Europe as Wootz Steel used in the Damascus sword, or metallurgical wonders like smelting of Zinc or copper prevalent in India.  I wasn’t taught that the Indian share of the World economy plummeted from 24% in 1750 to 1.7% in 1900 as a result of systematic plunder by the British.  Instead, I was made to believe that it was the British, who taught us language and civilization, and made the country of “India” for people, who were otherwise backward and disorganized.

Net result: I learned the British view of a concocted India, rather than an organic view of India’s traditions.  Today, while there are encouraging signs of hunger in the minds of young Indians, the situation has not changed significantly. Hence, it is reasonable to assume that many Indians may find Modi’s “Sanskrit” quotes to sound like “Greek and Latin”.   The purpose of this article is to unfold the meaning of those quotes.  In order to achieve this end, some background education is necessary.

Sanskrit:

The word “Sanskrit” is the Anglicized form of the word “samskrtam” (संस्कृतम्).  The etymological definition of the word is “samyak kriyate सम्यक् क्रियते” or “(that which is) well done”’.  This is further interpreted as “a language which developed organically with the ability to express the subtlest of concepts (of the Dharma worldview) very well”.  This language is also called “devabhaaShaa देवभाषा” or “the language of the Gods”.

A 1650 copy of the

A 1650 copy of the “Peacock and Snake” problem of Bhaskara II’s Lilavati written circa 1200. (Picture Credit: Mathematical Association of America)

The itihaasaas Ramayana and Mahabharata, the Vedas, which includes the Upanishads, the puraanaas like Bhaagavatam and Maarkandeya, the elaborate commentaries on the Upanishads, commentaries on those commentaries, Arthashastra, treatises on sciences like Ayurveda, Yoga, Mathematics, and Jyotisham (astronomy), to name a few, are all written in Sanskrit.  In short, anything of significance to India’s past is in the language of Sanskrit.  Forget Sanskrit and be a flotsam in India.

Upanishad:

The Upanishads (उपनिषद्) contain the conclusive tenets of the Vedas, the primary source text of the Hindus.  Since they generally occur at the end of the Vedas, the Upanishads are also referred to as Vedanta.

The Vedas talk about human aspirations and categorizes them into Artha – the pursuit of security, Kama – pursuit of pleasures, Dharma – aligning our pursuits to common sense ethics and religious principles with a deep sense of self-responsibility, and finally Moksha, or Liberation.  The Upanishads primarily deal with the subject matter of Moksha.  Different traditions define Moksha differently.  Reaching a specific God at a specific location at the end of one’s life is one view of Moksha.  A view that is simultaneously most intellectually challenging and seemingly cognizable is that of Advaita, which claims that “You are what you are seeking”, or, “The essential nature of the individual, the nature of Ishwara (the Omniscient), and the nature of the Universe are identical”.

The meaning of the word “Upanishad” is derived as follows:

Upa (उप) – Near, in proximity (for example, the eyeglasses are called upanetram, upa – near, netram – eyes, i.e. that which is near the eyes).  Here “Near” refers to “that which is nearest to me”, which is the “Self” itself, referred to the first person singular “I”.

Ni (नि) – in the sense of certainty (nischayaatmakaH, निश्चयात्मकः)

Sad (सद्) – the removal or destruction (of ignorance)

A Palm-Leaf-like rendition of the Isha Upanishad.

A Palm-Leaf-like rendition of the Isha Upanishad.

Therefore, Upanishad means “well ascertained removal of (the ignorance) of the Self.  I.e. The knowledge of Self.  Because the pursuit of the Knowledge of the Self is in the realm of enquiry and devoid of beliefs, this subject has challenged and enamored the greatest thinkers of the world.

PuraaNaas:

PuraaNaas (पुराणः) are accounts that portray the glories of Ishwara[2] (ईश्वरः) and of men of high learning, valor, and righteousness. For example, the account of Harishchandra is dealt with in one of the PuraaNas, wherein he is portrayed as one who will never speak a lie, regardless of circumstances.

Figure 5: In Harishchandra PuraaNa, Harishchandra nonchalantly refuses to cremate his penniless wife’s son without a payment.

In Harishchandra PuraaNa, Harishchandra nonchalantly refuses to cremate his penniless wife’s son without a payment.

His truthfulness forces him to undergo hardship such as having to leave his wife and child.  As children, we used to be in awe listening to our grandmother narrate these stories day after day.  Such stories in the PuraaNaas set up challenging ideals and values for the individual.  The PuraaNaas are eighteen in number, the most famous of which is the Bhaagavata PuraaNa, which portrays the glories of Sri Krishna.

Itihaasa:

Ramayana and Mahabhaarata are the two itihaasaas (इतिहासः) of the Sanaatana Dharma.  This worditihaasa is often translated as “mythology”, i.e. a study of myths.  And “Mythology” is a glorious word for “fiction”. But, if you look at the etymology, it means:  “Iti ha aasa इति ह आस” thus indeed it was, implying the presentation of historical events, not as a historian would, but a poet would.  The itihaasaas have been passed on from one generation to another for an unknown number of millennia.  It is considered sacred.  Indians, therefore, believe that Rama and his brothers existed, as also Krishna, Arjuna and his brothers and the extended family.  Ramayana is a poem, the first and the longest poem written by any human being – at only 24,000 verses!  Hence, Valmiki is called aadikavi, आदिकविः, or “first poet”, and Ramayana called “mahaakaavyam”, or “first/grand poem”. Ask any Hindu, if Ramayana is a “myth” and they will be shocked, yet they have been conditioned to use the word “mythology”, an erroneous translation of the word itihaasa.  Ramayana is a part and parcel of the history of India.

Shri Rama supervising the construction of bridge (Rama Setu) to Sri Lanka, in Ramayana.

Shri Rama supervising the construction of bridge (Rama Setu) to Sri Lanka, in Ramayana.

With this background, in the succeeding parts of this narrative, I will explain some seminal phrases that Narendra Modi often quotes, which reveal the vision of India’s sages.  Some of these are:

  1. Ahimsa paramo dharmaH (अहिंसा परमो धर्मः)
  2. Sarve bhavantu sukhinaH (सर्वे भवन्तु सुखिनः)
  3. Satyameva Jayate (सत्यमेव जयते)
  4. Tena Tyaktena BhunjeethaaH (तेन त्यक्तेन भुन्जीथाः)
  5. Janani janmabhoomishcha svargaadapi gareeyasee (जननी जन्मभूमिश्च स्वर्गादपि गरीयसी)
  6. Vasudaiva Kutumbakam (वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम्)
  7. Ekam Sat Viprah Bahudha Vadanti (एकं सत् विप्राः बहुधा वदन्ति)
  8. Yatra naryastu pujyante, ramante tatra devataaH (यत्र नर्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते, रमन्ते तत्र देवताः)

References:

  1. While this topic has been debated, what is stated is the mainstream narrative.
  2. Note that I am not using the word “God”.  Being a word in English, the word “God” refers to an entity in Christianity that isn’t the same referred to by Ishwara in Sanaatana Dharma.
Continue Reading

articles

UNDERSTANDING THE CHRONOLOGY OF RAIGADH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE GIVEN TO ITS STRUCTURAL MONUMENTS

Published

on

Raigadh: A Journey Through Thirteen Centuries of Architectural Heritage

Nestled in the Sabarkantha district of Gujarat, the small village of Raigadh (23°36’17” N, 73°10’42” E) stands as a remarkable open-air museum of Indian architectural evolution. From the late 7th century to the 20th century, this humble settlement has accumulated an extraordinary collection of structural monuments that chronicle the reign of multiple dynasties and the transformation of religious beliefs and practices. By studying Raigadh’s monuments, we can trace the architectural innovations, iconographical changes, and cultural shifts that shaped North Gujarat’s history.

The Maitraka Legacy: The Mota Mahadev Temple


The oldest surviving monument in Raigadh is the Mota Mahadev temple, dating to the late 7th century CE during the Maitraka period. This Shiva temple exemplifies the Phamsana architectural style, featuring a distinctive Ksoni or Gandharic-type Shikhara (spire). The original Maitraka design consisted of a Shikhara and a Garbhagriha (inner sanctum), adorned with intricate sculptures of Ganesha and Maithuna (amorous couple) figures that reveal the artistic sophistication of this ancient dynasty. What makes this temple particularly significant is its continuous religious importance. Centuries later, during the Solanki period (10th century), the temple underwent substantial renovations. The Solanki additions included a Mandapa (entrance hall) with a Kakshasana (bench-like structure), complete with plain pillars topped with lotus patterns. This evolution reveals how temples were actively modified across generations, adapting to changing worship practices. The temple boasts sculptures from both periods, including a standing Ganesha from the Maitraka era and later additions like a Nandi (bull mount of Shiva), Pranala (water channel), and a goddess figure, likely Parvati. Though the temple has undergone modern renovations with lime mortar and cement, it remains a living temple, worshipped especially during auspicious occasions like Mahashivaratri.

The Saindhava Contribution: Kashi Vishwanath Temple

The 9th century witnessed the construction of the Kashi Vishwanath temple during the Saindhava period, reflecting the dynasty’s influence in North Gujarat. Built entirely in sandstone, this temple showcases a Phamsana Vimana with a Ksoni Phamsanakara Shikhara—a pyramidal or diamond-shaped design that distinguishes it from contemporary structures. The east-facing temple follows an architectural plan featuring a Vimana with a sanctum and no ambulatory path, representing a distinct approach to temple design. The sculptural program of this temple deserves particular attention. The northern wall displays Andhakasuravedha, a four-handed form of Shiva depicted with a trident and the demon Andhakasura positioned above. The western wall features Bhairavi, the feminine counterpart of Bhairava, captured in an energetic Rudra Tandava (cosmic dance) with bent legs and an attending drummer. The southern wall houses Chamunda, a form of Katyayni and one of the Sapta Matrika (Seven Mothers), rendered in surprisingly human form rather than skeletal. These sculptures reveal sophisticated iconographical knowledge and demonstrate the 9th-century artistic tradition’s depth. Currently, the temple survives as a living sanctuary, though its sculptures show weathering, and structural elements like pillars and amlaka (stone finial) display signs of decay. It remains an active worship site on significant Hindu festivals, preserving unbroken continuity of devotion spanning over a millennium.

 Innovation and Utility: The Solanki Stepwells

Contemporary with the Kashi Vishwanath temple’s later phases, the 10th-century Solanki period produced remarkable stepwells (Bhadra) that reflect advanced hydraulic engineering. These structures, constructed in sandstone with an east-west orientation, descend six storeys deep, featuring curved arches on each level. One stepwell includes a small chamber at its terminus, adorned with a Ganesha sculpture on its lintel, connecting utilitarian architecture with spiritual significance. The third storey houses a Chamunda sculpture whose stylistic qualities echo the iconographical changes occurring in this period. These stepwells appear strategically positioned near the Kashi Vishwanath temple, suggesting integrated temple complexes designed for both religious and practical purposes. The architectural features, particularly the pillar designs, parallel those found in the Solanki Mandapa of Mota Mahadev, indicating consistent construction methodologies across different monument types.

The Jain Testament: The Solanki Jain Temple

Built during the 11th or 12th century under Solanki patronage—likely under monarchs like Jayasimha Siddharaja or Kumarapal—the Jain temple dedicated to Sri Kunthunath (the seventeenth Jain Tirthankara) represents significant architectural complexity. The temple follows a comprehensive architectural plan including a Vimana, Garbhagriha, multiple Mandapas, and an Antrala (intermediate chamber). Sculptures of Sri Kunthunath and Vardhaman Mahavira adorn its walls, while a Vyali (mythical creature) appears on the lintel. Two inscriptions, written in Devanagari script, provide invaluable documentary evidence. The first, dated to Samvata 1717, records donations by Bhavanidas and his ancestors. The second mentions Lakha, identified as the sculptor of the Sri Kunthunath figure. These inscriptions document religious practices and preserve the names of patron families, offering rare glimpses into medieval Gujarati society. Despite its architectural sophistication, the temple currently stands in a ruined state, a poignant reminder of cultural heritage’s fragility.

Later Developments: Medieval and Modern Monuments

Subsequent centuries added new layers to Raigadh’s architectural narrative. The 14th-15th century Shakti temple, locally known as Repri Mata temple, reflects the Maru-Gurjara architectural style. The 17th-18th century Chhatri (cenotaph), dedicated to rulers of the Marwar dynasty governing Idar, stands on the village’s southern foothills in ruined condition. Most recently, the Goswami community, arriving in the early 20th century, established over 50 Samadhis (memorial structures), of which 28 remain today, representing modern funerary architecture and spiritual continuity.

Conclusion:

Reading History in Stone Raigadh’s monuments form an extraordinary chronological narrative spanning thirteen centuries. From the Maitraka Shiva temple to 20th-century Samadhis, these structures document the rise and fall of dynasties, the evolution of religious iconography, the permanence of worship, and the persistence of community memory. By preserving Raigadh’s architectural heritage, we conserve not merely buildings, but the lived history of Gujarat’s diverse populations and their enduring cultural values.

Continue Reading

articles

Stones, Seals & Grants: Reweaving Chalukya Power in the Early Medieval Deccan

Published

on

Stones, Seals & Grants: Understanding Chalukya Power in the Early Medieval Deccan

Introduction

For centuries, the Chalukya dynasty has been studied through the lens of royal conquest and centralized empires. However, recent archaeological and epigraphic discoveries are fundamentally reshaping our understanding of how power actually functioned in early medieval Deccan. Rather than viewing Chalukya authority as a top-down system of control, scholars now recognize it as a sophisticated network of practices—woven together through temple patronage, copper-plate grants, and carefully negotiated alliances with local elites. This shift in perspective reveals that Chalukya power was not simply inherited or conquered; it was continuously constructed, performed, and reinforced through everyday administrative practices, sacred architecture, and strategic land redistribution.

The Chalukya Dynasty: Rulers of a Networked Deccan

Historical Context and Geographic Reach

The Chalukyas (6th–12th centuries CE) emerged as one of the most significant dynasties of the Deccan region, ruling vast territories that encompassed both Western and Eastern domains. The Western Chalukyas controlled areas centered around Badami and later Kalyani, while the Eastern Chalukyas dominated the Vengi region. This geographical division was not a sign of weakness but rather a sophisticated administrative strategy that allowed the dynasty to maintain influence across diverse regions with distinct cultural, linguistic, and economic characteristics.

Beyond the Model of Centralized Empire

Traditional historical narratives have often portrayed medieval Indian dynasties as centralized empires with absolute monarchs wielding power from capital cities. The Chalukya case complicates this model significantly. Rather than a unified, monolithic state structure, Deccan power under the Chalukyas operated as a network of negotiated relationships. Local elites, temple institutions, agrarian communities, and emerging feudatory chiefs all played active roles in sustaining and legitimizing Chalukya rule. This networked approach enabled the dynasty to accommodate regional diversity while maintaining broader political cohesion—a model that proved remarkably effective across six centuries of rule.

Material Evidence: The Kodad Copper Plates and Mudimanikyam Temple

The Kodad Copper Plate (c. 918 CE)

One of the most significant recent discoveries is the Kodad Copper Plate, dated to approximately 918 CE during the reign of a Vengi Chalukya king. This inscribed plate is far more than a ceremonial artifact; it represents a crucial administrative document that reveals how power was systematically documented and disseminated.[1]

The Kodad plate records a coronation grant—an official allocation of land and privileges awarded to celebrate a royal succession. The text provides several layers of historical information: a detailed genealogy of the ruling family, specifications of land rewards granted to favored nobles and institutions, and explicit taxation clauses that clarified revenue rights and obligations. By examining such documents, we gain insight into how military service was converted into permanent landed privileges—a process that formalized social hierarchy and bound regional elites to the Chalukya crown through tangible economic benefits.

Significantly, the Kodad plate contains the earliest clear reference to the emerging Kakatiya chiefs, a lineage that would eventually establish its own powerful dynasty in the region. This notation illustrates how Chalukya inscriptions served as administrative records that tracked the rise of new regional powers, a dynamic relationship rather than static dominance.

The Mudimanikyam Panchakūta Temple (8th–9th century)

While inscriptions document administrative decisions, architecture demonstrates power in physical space. The Mudimanikyam temple complex in Telangana, constructed during the 8th–9th centuries, exemplifies the distinctive Chalukya approach to sacred architecture. The temple is remarkable for its unique five-shrine configuration—a design known as panchakuta (five towers)—which represents a sophisticated synthesis of architectural traditions.

The complex blends elements of both Kadamba and Nagara architectural styles, reflecting the cosmopolitan architectural culture of the Deccan. Rather than imposing a single standardized temple design across their empire, the Chalukyas appears to have encouraged regional architectural experimentation and adaptation. This flexibility strengthened their cultural authority because temples served dual purposes: they functioned as ritual centers for religious communities and simultaneously acted as tangible markers of royal presence and patronage. A Chalukya temple was not merely a place of worship—it was a statement of political legitimacy built into the landscape.

Expanding the Archaeological Picture: Brick Temples and New Discoveries

Brick Temple Foundations in Maharashtra (11th century)

Archaeological excavations in Maharashtra have uncovered the foundations of Chalukya-period temples constructed from brick rather than stone. This discovery, perhaps seemingly mundane, fundamentally challenges assumptions about Chalukya temple architecture. Historians had previously assumed that all significant Chalukya religious structures were built from stone, implying a uniform, monumental approach. The brick temples reveal a different reality: regional architectural experimentation and adaptation were deliberate policies, not exceptions.

The presence of diverse construction materials—stone for major complexes, brick for regional temples—suggests that Chalukya elites understood different building strategies for different contexts. Grand stone temples in Telangana and Karnataka communicated royal magnificence and permanence; more modest brick temples in Maharashtra demonstrated accessibility and cultural engagement with local communities. Together, these varied architectural strategies reinforced Chalukya authority across diverse populations and geographies.

New Copper Plate Grants from Telangana

Recently conserved copper plate grants from Telangana provide extraordinarily detailed records of agrarian administration and fiscal management. These plates record boundary descriptions with precision, specify tax divisions among different categories of land, and detail village allocations and their redistributions. Unlike the Kodad plate, which focuses on royal coronation, these records illuminate the administrative machinery of everyday governance.

These documents reveal a sophisticated understanding of land as a political instrument. Grants of land were not merely economic transactions; they were calculated acts of resource redistribution designed to secure and maintain the loyalty of local elites. Each plate can be read as evidence of deliberate fiscal policy intended to balance competing interests and consolidate authority. As the presentation notes, “land is equal to the currency of political negotiation” in the Chalukya context—a profound insight into the material basis of medieval power.

Methodology: How Scholars Reconstruct the Past

Understanding Chalukya power requires a multidisciplinary approach that synthesizes diverse types of evidence. Scholars examining this period employ several complementary research techniques:

Epigraphic Analysis: Scholars carefully translate and analyze copper plates and stone inscriptions, extracting genealogical information, administrative details, and references to contemporary personalities and places. This linguistic detective work reveals how ruling families represented themselves and legitimized their authority through written language.

Architectural Study: Detailed examination of temple plans, stylistic elements, construction techniques, and spatial organization provides evidence of aesthetic choices, regional influences, and the pragmatic concerns of builders. Architecture speaks when documents are silent.

Prosopography: This technique involves systematically tracking named individuals mentioned in inscriptions—nobles, officials, priests, and merchants—across multiple documents. By tracing individuals through space and time, scholars reconstruct networks of power and patronage that connected royal courts to regional societies.

Archaeological Context: Careful excavation, material analysis, and scientific dating techniques (such as radiocarbon analysis) ground inscriptions and architecture in chronological frameworks and material reality.

Synthesis: The final step integrates all this evidence. When copper plate texts are cross-linked with temple foundations, genealogical references with architectural styles, and administrative records with excavation reports, a fuller picture emerges—one that shows how Chalukya authority was constructed through ritual performance, economic distribution, and everyday administrative practice rather than brute force alone.

Rewriting Chalukya History: From Royal Chronicles to Institutional Practice

The Institutional Turn

Recent discoveries fundamentally alter how we conceptualize Chalukya rule. Rather than reading chronicles of royal conquest and succession, scholars now focus on the everyday institutions that sustained power: the bureaucratic systems that recorded grants, the temple organizations that managed resources, the elite networks that mediated between royal authority and local communities, and the agricultural base that generated the surplus wealth necessary to support courts, temples, armies, and administration.

This shift from “top-down” models of power to “institutional” models represents one of the most significant methodological changes in medieval Indian historiography. It acknowledges that power operates through systems and relationships, not merely through the decisions of individual rulers.

The Kodad Plates and Legal Transformation

The Kodad plates exemplify this institutional approach. These documents reveal how military service could be converted into permanent landed privileges through legal text and bureaucratic procedure. A warrior rewarded by a Chalukya king received not merely a temporary gift but a heritable right—a foundation for dynasty-building at the regional level. Over generations, such grants accumulated and transformed military subordinates into quasi-independent feudatory chiefs. This process, documented in the Kodad plates and similar inscriptions, explains how large empires gradually fragmented into smaller principalities while maintaining the ideology of a unified system.

Temple Building as Political Strategy

The Mudimanikyam and brick temple discoveries demonstrate that both monumental and modest temple construction were deliberate political strategies. Temples were not merely expressions of religious piety; they were tools for projecting political and cultural presence into territories where royal courts might be geographically distant. A well-constructed, beautifully designed temple in a regional town served as a permanent advertisement of royal patronage and cultural sophistication.

Agrarian Administration and Elite Loyalty

The newly conserved copper plate grants from Telangana provide the most granular evidence for how Chalukya power was maintained through agrarian management. These plates record:

  • Boundary specifications: Precise definitions of land parcels, indicating sophisticated cartographic understanding
  • Tax divisions: Categories of land taxed at different rates, reflecting different agricultural potentials and uses
  • Village allocations: Systematic distribution of resources among communities and individuals

These records illuminate a political economy where land grants were carefully calibrated to reward loyal subordinates while maintaining agricultural productivity. An elite family granted fertile river-valley land would prosper and remain grateful; a family granted marginal lands might seek alliance elsewhere. The grants thus represent calculated political decisions, not arbitrary donations. Each plate is a small window into the pragmatic calculations of medieval power.

Conclusion: Toward a More Complete Understanding

The discovery and analysis of Kodad copper plates, Mudimanikyam temple, brick temple foundations, and newly conserved Telangana grants collectively reshape our understanding of the Chalukya dynasty. These material remains demonstrate that Chalukya power was not the product of centralized royal authority imposing itself from above. Rather, it emerged from a sophisticated web of interconnected practices: inscriptions that documented decisions and fixed them in public memory, temples that physically manifested royal piety and authority, land grants that bound regional elites through economic self-interest, and administrative networks that coordinated diverse territories.

The Kodad plates show how legal texts formalized the conversion of military service into hereditary privilege, thereby enabling the gradual emergence of regional feudatory dynasties. The Mudimanikyam temple complex and brick temple foundations demonstrate that Chalukya elites deliberately employed architecture—whether monumental or modest—to express political presence and engage with diverse communities across their vast territories.

Most importantly, these discoveries shift scholarly focus from courtly chronicles and royal conquests to the everyday institutions that sustained Chalukya rule: the scribes who wrote grants, the priests who consecrated temples, the administrators who managed villages, and the elites who negotiated power within a system of mutual obligation and benefit.

Future research in archives, excavation of additional temple sites, and scientific analysis of material remains will continue to illuminate these institutional foundations of medieval power. Yet already, these recent discoveries make clear that understanding the Chalukyas requires attending not to military campaigns alone but to the mundane instruments—stones, seals, and grants—through which authority was actually constructed and maintained across six centuries of rule in the medieval Deccan.

References

[1] Kodad Copper Plate (c. 918 CE). Records coronation grant of Vengi Chalukya king with genealogy, land rewards, and taxation clauses. Earliest clear reference to emerging Kakatiya chiefs.

Further Reading

  • Mudimanikyam Panchakūta Temple (8th–9th century). Five-shrine Chalukya-style complex in Telangana with architectural blend of Kadamba and Nagara traditions.
  • Brick Temple Foundations (11th century, Maharashtra). Archaeological evidence of regional architectural adaptation and experimentation.
  • Copper Plate Grants (Telangana). Records of agrarian administration, tax divisions, and village allocations demonstrating detailed fiscal management strategies.
Continue Reading

articles

Archaeological Wealth of Sirsee Village

Published

on

Sirsee Village in Lalitpur district, Uttar Pradesh, reveals a treasure trove of archaeological remains spanning centuries. This small settlement, rich in sculptures, hero stones, temple fragments, and a moated fort, connects to broader historical networks of the Gupta, Gurjara-Pratihara, and Bundela periods. Recent documentation highlights its untapped potential for understanding regional cultural continuity.

Location and Context
Sirsee lies 28 km from Lalitpur, 54 km from Deogarh, 10 km from Siron Khurd (ancient Siyadoni), and 24 km from Talbehat. Nestled amid key historical centers from the Gupta (4th-6th century CE) and post-Gupta eras, it sits near trade routes like the Jhansi-Bhopal path. Nearby Siyadoni, founded in the Gurjara-Pratihara period (8th-11th century CE), underscores Sirsee’s role in economic and cultural exchanges.

Archaeological Sites
Researchers identified seven key locations with artifacts, many in deteriorated states yet revered by locals.

Site 1: Features a hero stone and temple members, hinting at martial commemorations and religious structures.

Site 2: Includes a fort with Surya and Ganesha sculptures, Bundela-style jharokha (balcony), and a temple complex encircled by a moat.

Site 3: Hosts a Mahishasur Mardini (Durga slaying the buffalo demon) sculpture and mural paintings.

Site 4: Contains broken sculptures, an inscription, hero-stone fragments, and a Hanuman figure near temple ruins.

Site 5: Displays additional broken sculptures and ruins, possibly linked to later shrines.

Site 6: Encompasses another temple complex with structural remnants.

Site 7 (implied): Sati stambha (memorial pillars) and further fragments, indicating post-medieval practices.

Satellite imagery from Google Earth (2025 Airbus and Maxar) maps these sites, showing the fort’s scale (up to 200m) and strategic layout.

Key Artifacts
Sculptures dominate, including broken icons of deities like Mahishasur Mardini, Surya, Ganesha, and Hanuman, often in black stone or similar material. Hero stones and sati stambhas suggest battles and sati rituals, common in medieval India. Inscriptions, though fragmented, may reveal patronage or events, while temple fragments point to Shaivite or Vaishnavite worship. Bundela-style elements, like jharokhas, link to 16th-18th century Rajput architecture in Bundelkhand.

Historical Significance
Earliest occupation likely dates to the 11th-12th century CE, based on sculptural styles, though proximity to Gupta sites suggests earlier influences. The fort implies defensive needs, possibly tied to trade route conflicts or regional power struggles. Hero stones evoke battles, aligning with Pratihara-era warfare, while the moat and location near Siyadoni indicate a trade or worship hub. Continuity persists as villagers worship these relics, blending ancient heritage with living tradition.

Research Questions
The presentation raises critical queries: What defines Sirsee’s occupation timeline? Why build a fort here? Did trade or pilgrimage drive its prominence? Evidence of wars? Connections to Gupta, Pratihara, or Bundela rulers? No systematic study exists, urging documentation to trace settlement origins and evolution. Yashraj Panth, Research Associate at Sharva Purattav Solution Private Limited, calls for further exploration.

Sirsee embodies Bundelkhand’s layered past, from medieval sculptures to Bundela forts, demanding preservation and study.

Continue Reading

Trending

Designed by ihar © 2025